• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Become a Premium Member
  • About

Road Bike Rider Cycling Site

Expert road cycling advice, since 2001

  • Pinterest
  • Facebook
  • Bikes & Gear
  • Training & Health
  • Reviews
  • Cycling Ebooks
    • Ebooks Training
    • Ebooks Skills
    • E-Articles Training
    • E-Articles Nutrition
  • Member Area
  • Newsletter

Niterider Lumina 220 Head Light

By Paul Smith

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOT!

  • Good around town and errand running light
  • Useful as a potential backup
  • Easy USB recharging; no batteries to deal with
  • Solid handlebar mount
  • LED indicator to show remaining charge

NOT!

  • Non-user replaceable Li-Ion battery
  • Easy to outrun the beam at higher speeds
Niterider
http://www.niterider.com/
Cost: $69.95 MSRP ($60 online)
How obtained:  sample from company
RBR Sponsor:  no
Tested:  25+ hours
 
Tech specs
Weight:  126g 
Charge time:  4 hours
Battery:  Li-ion

Lumina 220 a Solid Light But Not Great for Commuting

Just like its bigger brother (the Lumina 700, also reviewed in RBR), the Lumina 220 has four main modes — low, medium and high, plus the same useful flash mode for being seen when riding in the daytime. The Lumina 220 is a very small, self-contained unit and weighs only 126g.

Low output is 80 lumens, with aclaimed runtime of 4 hours, medium is 120 lumens, with claimed runtime 2 hours, 45 minutes, and the highest output is 220 lumens, with a claimed runtime 1 hour, 30 minutes. Recharging the Lithium-Ion battery is easy using the supplied mini-USB cable that can be plugged into your computer or a wall outlet with an adaptor (not supplied). Also supplied is a helmet mount which I did not test for this review.

More Suited to Around-Town Riding

The light output is noticeably different from the Lumina 700, as you would expect. At the highest output it can be used as a “see-by” light when the speeds are below 20mph. The beam is dispersed widely enough to allow road hazards to be picked out.

However, the main uses I can see for this light are lower speed riding, such as running errands or simply ambling about town.

Because technology has improved to the point of the Lumina 700, for example, weighing only 46 grams more, and producing more than triple the number of lumens, it or another high-output light would be a far better choice for any real commuting needs.

Conclusion

Good run times and a quick four-hour recharge time are this light’s standout points, but its utility is limited. It’s an acceptable light for slower, around-town riding, but other lights should be considered for more demanding uses.

February 2014


Paul Smith regularly reviews products for RBR. He’s an avid recreational roadie who lives in thePiedmont area of North Carolina. He commutes often, and his car is worth less than any of his bikes. Click to read Paul’s full bio.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Articles

  • Newsletter Issue No. 1053
  • Can you use Shimano rotors with SRAM brakes? (Or vice versa?)
  • 16 Tips for Increasing Your Annual Cycling Mileage
  • Intense Exercisers Have More Plaques but Fewer Heart Attacks

Recent Newsletters

Newsletter Issue No. 1053

Newsletter Issue No. 1052

Newsletter Issue No. 1051

Newsletter Issue No. 1050

Newsletter Issue No. 1049

Footer

Affiliate Disclosure

Our cycling expert editors and writers choose every product we review. We may earn an affiliate commission if you buy from one of our product links, at no extra cost to you. This income supports our site.

Follow Us

  • Pinterest
  • Facebook

Privacy Policy

Still Haven’t Found What You’re Looking For?

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in