
By Stan Purdum
I’m writing this on New Year’s Eve, 2024, having just tallied up my bicycle mileage for the year. It amounts to about half of the distance I used to put in annually during my heyday, but I’m older now. It’s still a number I feel good about. But matching — or even exceeding — a previous year’s count no longer seems important to me.

Aging, of course, accounts for some of the mileage reduction, but there are better reasons as well. My wife and I care for our 4-year-old granddaughter two-to-three days a week while her parents work, and some of those days are ones where I would have gone cycling had we not had childcare responsibilities. But our granddaughter is a delight, and I willingly devote those days to being with her. Even with her, however, I still get a little exercise as I trot beside her as she works at learning to balance herself on her own bike (an 18-inch wheeler, still with training wheels, which she doesn’t want me to remove yet). I look forward to when she and I can ride together, but in the meantime, I’ve got blessings to count.
In any case, cycling is about so much more than mileage. In his final official email for 2024 (“The Leadout”), Adam Becket, who is the news editor of Cycling Weekly, and a much younger man than I, announced that his resolution for 2025 is that he will not be chasing distance targets. He noted that recently a lot of people have been posting their Strava stats for the year, but he said, “The Strava-ication of exercise means we are almost always looking at numbers. It’s a great way to push yourself, but I think it might have gone too far.”
Becket continued, “2025 will be the year I try to cycle just to have fun, for its own sake, and try not to worry about how far I’ve cycled in a certain month, how that stacks up against others and also my past self. I’m hoping this will allow me to just enjoy riding my bike, rather than seeing it as a chore sometimes — no more thinking ‘oh, I have to cycle today if I’m going to keep ahead of my target’ — and more ‘cycling makes me happy; let’s go for a bike ride.’”
I’m still on the email list from a bike club I used to belong to in a previous location. That club schedules rides every day of the year, so the emails are usually to alert club members about scheduled rides that are being cancelled, often because of bad weather. In a message that arrived this morning, the ride leader was plainly aware that some might be chasing a distance target. She wrote, “I am not planning on riding in the rain today. If you want to get those last mileage goals, be safe.”
It’s good to have the choice, and even better to have it without guilt while counting our blessings.
Stan Purdum has ridden several long-distance bike trips, including an across-America ride recounted in his book Roll Around Heaven All Day, and a trek on U.S. 62, from Niagara Falls, New York, to El Paso, Texas, the subject of his book Playing in Traffic. Stan, a freelance writer and editor, lives in Ohio. See more at www.StanPurdum.com.
Great thoughts and I agree. I am pleased with the 2000 miles I rode this year, even though its half of what it thought I’d ride when I planned my 2024. you see, on 1/4/24, I was injured during a non-cycling activity … Two broken bones and a torn tendon made the simplest tasks difficult and painful, and put me in physical therapy for 3+ months. It was only in April that I finally got on my bike, with much trepidation. Turns out that cycling was just what I needed to get better, and before Memorial Day I rode a 200k brevet in record time (for me).
Relationships and appreciation are more important than mileage. At the dawn of 2025, I am just grateful to be vertical. The 2000 miles I rode are just the icing on the cake.
Steve
RUSA 12952
I assert that we’ve all been hoodwinked. We should never have been tallying distance. We should have been tallying time. Distance favors the fast. Time favors the cyclist.
Excellent point. In the last location I lived, I tracked miles and average speed. Now that I live in a hilly area, I track time and feet climbed. Time on the bike is a better long term measure.
Totally agree. I live in the mountains, with literally no more than half a mile of flat on most rides. Neither distance nor time really matters here. Because riding up mountains takes a lot more time, and effort, than a much longer ride on the flats. I just go as far as I feel like — and don’t really care how long it takes.
Time is much more relevant than distance. A gravel or MYB ride will be shorter in distance but usually harder. Same for a virtual trainer ride.
Stan, I pretty much concur with you. I still like to see high mileage numbers for the year but enjoyment and just being out on the bike is my priority. Speed isn’t there like it use to be but not a slouch either. I’m just enjoying the ride and fellowship.
“Not everything that counts can be counted.” Einstein.
Smart guy, and a bit of a cyclist.
Whil I do keep track of mileage, I have only one goal: to ride when I can. It all works out.